Saturday, 26 July 20252:45 - 4:00 PMHindley 2 |
Bridget Knights Lojic Abstract: Improving quality of life and reducing restrictive practices is a cornerstone of effective behaviour support services (Carberry et al., 2024; Leif et al., 2024). Achieving these outcomes, however, is often met with resistance from diverse stakeholders (Fisher et al., 2024; Leif et al., 2023). In such instances, innovative organisational behaviour management (OBM) approaches are necessary (Konstantinidou et al., 2023). This case study presents a constructionist OBM approach to eliminating seclusion for a 14-year-old in out-of-home care, where restrictive practices were endorsed by Child Safety. Initial data-driven recommendations failed due to stakeholder resistance, implementers’ concerns about managing behaviour without restraints, and systemic barriers. As such, these challenges prompted a shift to a constructionist approach, focusing on identifying systemic obstacles and collaboratively building implementers’ skills (Goldiamond et al., 2002; McGill et al., 2018). Through targeted training, collaborative problem-solving, and a gradual shaping process, seclusion was eliminated, PRN chemical restraints were reduced, and the child’s engagement in daily activities and community participation improved. This approach also facilitated a plan for school and peer re-engagement after four years of disengagement, thereby demonstrating the value of a collaborative constructionist OBM approach in achieving meaningful change in complex behavioural support contexts. Target Audience: Practitioners working in or will be providing systemic support/approach Learning Objectives: At the conclusion of this presentation:
BACB CE Instructor: Oliver B. Roschke |
Advancing Positive Behaviour Support in Australia: A Constructional Approach |
John R. Wooderson & Oliver Roschke
Lojic Abstract: Positive Behaviour Support (PBS) has gained prominence in Australia as an alternative to aversive or overly restrictive practices. Yet, conventional applications often default to an eliminative stance, emphasising the reduction of “behaviours of concern” rather than the achievement of meaningful outcomes aligned with participant goals. This presentation explores how Goldiamond’s Constructional Approach can address these limitations by shifting the focus toward genuine choice, a core value of both PBS and broader human rights frameworks. Target Audience: Behavior analysts and practitioners and organisations working in Positive Behaviour Support in Australia Learning Objectives: At the conclusion of this presentation, participants will be able to:
|